COOPERATION CLAUSE HELD TO ALLOW PRESENCE OF
INSUREDS' WITNESS AT DEPOSITION
|
Homeowners |
Cooperation Clause |
|
Loss Conditions |
Insured Witness |
Loss procedure conditions in a homeowners
policy, applicable to property coverage, included the following statement:
"If a covered loss occurs, the insured person must....submit to
examination under oath by a person named by us and sign the transcript of the
examination."
The
insureds employed an independent adjuster to help adjust their claim against
the insurer after a loss to their residence. They appeared at a time and place
designated by the insurer to give sworn statements but refused to give
statements under oath unless the adjuster was present. The insurer refused to
allow his presence. Thereupon, the insureds sued for recovery under the policy.
The
trial court granted summary judgment for the insurer, which asserted that the
insureds had no basis for a lawsuit against it. It was presumed that the
insurer's motion for summary judgment was granted because of a determination
that the insureds had failed to cooperate, as required.
On
appeal, the court noted that the insurer had two of its claims people and an
attorney present at the examination meeting and that there was no prohibition
in the policy against the insureds having a witness present. The court said:
"We
are of the opinion that the (insureds) presented themselves ready, willing and
able to give a statement under oath as required by the policy. The (insurer's)
refusal to take the statement cannot be said to be a failure on the part of the
(insureds) to cooperate."
The
judgment of the trial court was reversed in favor of the insureds and against
the insurer. The insureds were found to have complied with the cooperation
clause.
WIDENER
ET UX, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TENNESSEE FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee. Tennessee Court of Appeals. No. 03A01-9506-CV-00203.
September 29, 1995. CCH 1996 Fire and Casualty Cases, Paragraph 5525.